logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.02 2017고단3522
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 24, 2017, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (hereinafter “Electronic Financial Transactions Act”) transferred a passbook, check, OTP, etc. connected to a new bank account (Account No. B) in the name in the name of the Defendant using Kwikset’s Kwikset’s service to the lender’s employees.

2. On May 26, 2017, a single person under whose name and influence as the cause of the “Ssing-outing” organization of fraud aiding and abetting the lending company’s employees from a non-permanent place and calls to the victim C for the change of the current high interest rate loans into a low interest rate loan of 8.5%. We need to refund the loan to the account notified by us and deposit the deposit.

“Along on May 29, 2017, the victim made a false statement, at around 16:35, 2017, KRW 6 million to the new bank account (Account Number B) in the name of the defendant; KRW 5 million to the new bank account (Account Number E) in the name of D around 30:12:24 of the same month; KRW 5 million to the new bank account (Account Number G) in the name of F around 14:18 of the same day; and KRW 15 million to the new bank account (Account Number I) in the name of H at around 11:51 of the same month.

On May 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested that the money deposited into a new bank account held in the name of the Defendant from a person who was not the name of the financial institution that was the cause of the phishing organization be transferred to another account; and (b) knew or could have known that the said money was not acquired through a criminal act or any other normal method; (c) on the same day, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 3 million out of the money acquired by the victimized person in cash.

As a result, the Defendant aided and abetted the crime of fraud of a person who was not the victim of the above name, by facilitating the acquisition of the money remitted by a person who was not the victim of the above scam organization.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to J, K, and C;

1. A report on the occurrence of the event, a new bank letter, a certificate of transfer transactions;

arrow