1. On December 30, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that each disposition rejecting reappointment made against the Plaintiffs is null and void.

2...

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1 of the parties is the defendant of D University (hereinafter referred to as "D University").

(2) On February 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) determined the employment period from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2015; and (b) appointed the Plaintiff A as D major tourism and assistant professor; and (c) Plaintiff B as D major food nutrition department and assistant professor, respectively.

B. On September 12, 2014, the Defendant notified Plaintiff B of the fact that the term of employment expires on February 28, 2015 and the procedure for filing an application for deliberation to be re-appointed with the Plaintiff on September 13, 2014. The Plaintiffs filed an application for deliberation to be re-appointed with the Defendant around that time. 2) On November 24, 2014, the Personnel Committee for the Faculty Members decided that the Plaintiffs will not be re-appointed with the result of deliberation to be re-appointed with the Plaintiffs on November 24, 2014. At that time, the Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of this fact.

3) The Plaintiffs were dissatisfied with and filed an application for review. However, the Korea Teachers’ Personnel Committee decided not to re-appoint the Plaintiffs as in the initial deliberation result, and on December 30, 2014, the president of the Korea Teachers’ Personnel Committee notified the Plaintiffs of the refusal to re-appoint the said contents (hereinafter “instant refusal to re-appoint”).

(c) The Defendant’s ground for refusal to re-appoint the Plaintiffs (as a result of the business evaluation), the teaching evaluation area is comprised of four areas of lectures, education evaluation area, quality evaluation area, and research business area. The evaluation area of Article 7 (Assignment 1), education evaluation area, and the education evaluation area shall be calculated by adding up the evaluation area of semesters to three semesters from the date of appointment. All calculations shall be calculated by adding up the arithmetic mean and counting from the third place to the second second place. The total number of evaluation of achievements shall be 100 points, and the number of scores by area shall be as shown below. The total number of evaluation of achievements shall be more than 80 points (100 points). The total number of evaluation areas of achievements shall be 10 points and shall be reappointed to the second second place.

The evaluation of the area classification shall be conducted.