beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 3574"
1. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant posted a false statement on March 28, 2017, at the Defendant’s residence in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, 303, his/her domicile, the Defendant: (a) access to the middle and high-class car page, the website for the trading of goods, and “Sales of a ship yard”; and (b) the Defendant reported and contacted the victim D with the above writing “on remittance of KRW 20,00,000,000,0000,000 won.”
However, the defendant was not in possession of a scarcity and did not have the intention and ability to send it even if he receives the payment from the injured party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 20,000 won from the injured party to the NongHyup Bank account (E) in the name of the defendant.
"2017 Highest 5815"
2. On May 14, 2017, around May 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s residence in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Incheon, to the “China High-Class Carbook”; (b) posted a false letter stating that “The Defendant sells LG pocket tickets tickets”; and (c) sold 23,000 won LG pocket tickets to the Victim F who reported and contacted the above writing.
However, the defendant was not in possession of LG Poet so that he did not have the intent and ability to display the price even if he receives the price from the injured party.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he acquired 23,000 won from the victim to the corporate bank account (G) in the name of the defendant.
3. On June 4, 2017, around June 4, 2017, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, by accessing a middle and high country’s place of paragraph 2, sold LG Poet tickets” and that “the Defendant sells 23,000 won LG Poet tickets to KRW 23,00” to the victim H who reported and contacted this writing.
However, the defendant was not in possession of LG Poet so that he did not have the intent and ability to display the price even if he receives the price from the injured party.
The defendant is the victim as above.