logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.14 2016고정1040
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On June 25, 2010, the Defendant is required to pay attorney fees to the victim C (52 years) within the E-style E-style brokerage office located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

It is intended to lend money to 7 million won to open to one month.

‘False speech' was made.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have any particular property or income, and there was an uncertain situation where the defendant could start up business as scheduled, and there was no clear plan to repay the borrowed money, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged person, he did not have the intention or ability to change it as prescribed.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 7 million won in cash from the damaged party.

B. The Defendant, on September 26, 2012, contracted with vegetable cancer within the above E certified broker office.

Medical expenses of 2 million won are required.

The loan made a false statement that he/she will complete the payment on the day.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant did not have any particular property or income and did not have any obvious change plan, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged person, he did not have the intention or ability to change it.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2 million from the victim’s new bank account (Account Number G) in the F.

2. On June 2012, the Defendant against the victim H would pay the victim H (hereinafter “J in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, I 2nd floor”) the cost of the Plaintiff’s fluoring signboard installed to the victim H (hereinafter “J”) at an insular location on the date of June 2012.

The purpose of this paper is to make a false statement to the effect that he was to obtain a KRW 30 million loan from the alcohol agency.

However, at the time of fact, it is unclear whether the Defendant may obtain a KRW 30 million loan from the agency, and even if the Defendant requested the installation of the signboard to the victim because there is no clear change in the plan to do not have any particular property or income.

arrow