logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.01.12 2016고정601
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2010, the Defendant loaned KRW 10 million to the victim’s “D” that he/she became aware of as a result of the introduction of a person who is located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was able to use it as living expenses or gambling money, etc., and there was no intention or ability to change it as a result of the difficult circumstances such as giving instructions for demanding the obligation at the time.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.

2. On December 15, 2010, the Defendant phoneed to the above victim and repaid the credit card terminal leasing service, “on the face of lending three million won as it is urgently required to pay the money.”

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was able to use it as living expenses or gambling money, etc., and there was no intention or ability to change it as a result of the difficult circumstances such as giving instructions for demanding the obligation at the time.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3 million from the victim, to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.

3. On March 30, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the place specified in paragraph (1) on March 30, 2011, he/she would receive money from an executor who borrowed the card value and one million won of expenses.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was able to use it as living expenses or gambling money, etc., and there was no intention or ability to change it as a result of the difficult circumstances such as giving instructions for demanding the obligation at the time.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and thereby, is the agricultural bank account under the name of the defendant from the victim.

arrow