A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 14, 2016, the victim B, the Defendant, at a restaurant operated by the Defendant in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, would lend the victim B with the money that he/she would have repaid.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to change the amount within the agreed time limit even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged person due to the lack of special property or income as the bad financial credit partner.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 3 million on the same day as the victim, KRW 4.4 million on the 18th day of the same month, KRW 2 million on the 19th day of the same month, and KRW 600,000 on the 19th day of the same month, and received KRW 80,000 on the 80,000 on the 25th day of July 2017, and received the same year.

8.25. 25. 2.1 million won around the same year.

9. Around 25, 200,000 won, around 25, 100,000 won and a total of 15,40,00 won were obtained and acquired through deception.

2. On June 27, 2016, the victim D Defendant: “A victim D needs to make a change in the said restaurant.”

It shall be paid in full with the loan of money.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the above even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, obtained delivery of KRW 10 million on the same day as the victim, KRW 10 million on May 25, 2017, and KRW 11 million on the aggregate from May 25, 2017.

3. On May 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the above restaurant around May 18, 2017, the victim E needs to remove money from the victim E.

It shall be paid in full with the loan of money.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the above even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received five million won from the same day as the victim and acquired it by fraud.

4. On April 23, 2014, the Defendant F is required to pay money to the Victim F in the above restaurant.

3. Money;