1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is used as follows; and (b) it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for addition as set forth in paragraph (3). Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Article 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea (which was enacted by July 17, 1948 and amended by June 15, 1960), Article 21 of the Military Administration Act, and Article 715, Article 710, and Article 711 of the Medical Service Act (amended by Act No. 471 of February 22, 1958), respectively.

3. Attached Form 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance to add the amounts of inheritance and consolation money:

A. In the end of paragraph (2)(3)(2)(25th 19th 25th 19th 2013), “The amount of damages claim for the network AS caused the Plaintiff’s death on October 20, 2013, KRW 857,142 was succeeded to KRW 367,346 (i.e., KRW 857,142 x KRW 3/7; less than KRW 3/7; hereinafter the same shall apply) to the Plaintiff GN, who was the Plaintiff’s wife, 24,897 (i.e., KRW 857,142 x 2/7).”

C. “10 Victims I” added “89,142,857 won (i.e., KRW 89,142,857 x 3/11 x 3/11) to the Plaintiff’s husband of the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff CB died on December 19, 2014, 89,14,142,857 x 89,147 x 3/11) on the end of the pertinent part of “10 Victims I” (as 31, 14, 142, 857 x 2/11).”

12. The part of paragraph 1 of Article 2(1) of the Victim K (Defense) (No. 32, No. 17, and No. 32) (No. 32, No. 17, and No. 18), “Plaintiff CG died on January 16, 2013.”