1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff A, including a claim for additional extension at the trial court, is as follows.

1. Basic facts

2. The parties' assertion

3. The occurrence of liability for damages; and

A. The reasoning for this court’s explanation concerning each of the above parts is as stated in each of the corresponding parts of the judgment of the first instance (No. 2, No. 10-14), except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. 1) Each “entry” in the Part 19 and part 16 of the Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be written as “the result of each party’s personal examination against the Plaintiffs of the first instance court”. 2) In the Part 3 of the Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance, the phrase “13 November 13, 201” shall be written as “the date of November 13, 1949.”

3) The following is added between the two to three parts of Part 14 of the judgment of the court of the first instance. The plaintiff Gap's claim for consolation money against Q Q Q Q Qc. The victim's death on March 4, 1961, which led to the death of the victim Eul's husband's sibling, the defendant asserts that the defendant should additionally pay 2,618,181 won, which is the corresponding amount, to the above plaintiff's death. However, as seen above, the defendant's tort against the victim's deceased C and his bereaved family members is about 1949, the date of presumption of death of the deceased C, and the defendant's claim for consolation money against the deceased's death was made on June 15, 2010 for which the defendant granted the same trust as the date of giving the defendant's claim for consolation money from 0 years to 10 years, and the defendant's claim for consolation money from 20 years, which is the one of the above defendant's damages claim against Qc.