Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment has become final.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was an employee of the victim E corporation for the purpose of heating and cooling facility construction business from March 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013, and was working as the victim's field leader at the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Construction Site. Defendant B was a worker employed by Defendant A.
The Defendants calculated the wages of workers by recognizing the face of the workers who are registered with the information processing unit installed at the above construction site in the manner of recognizing their attendance and leaving the work site. Taking advantage of the fact that they brought pictures to the workers registered in the Kameras of the above equipment and recognize them as the face of the workers, the Defendants registered those who are not the workers in the above construction site with the above equipment, and then bring them to substitute their photographs, or, even if they are the workers in the above construction site, bring them to the person who did not actually work at the work site in lieu of his photograph, and offered them to receive the wages from the victims by entering false information as if they worked normally at the work site.
Accordingly, around May 27, 2012, the Defendants: (a) around May 27, 2012, the Defendants entered false information as if Defendant B had worked at the above construction site and had worked normally at the above construction site; (b) calculated Defendant B’s wages of KRW 125,000; and (c) required the victims to transfer the amount of KRW 125,00 to Defendant B’s account in the same manner from around that time to August 2013; and (d) calculated wages by entering false information in the above device as if the total number of 19 workers worked at the above construction site normally, such as the list of crimes in the attached list, from that time to August 2013; and (b) calculated wages by entering false information in the above device as if Defendant B worked at the above construction site normally.