logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.20 2017노8254
업무방해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: ① the defendant engaged in other construction work in the vicinity of the construction site of this case at the time around January 5, 2017 as stated in the judgment of the court below; ② the defendant cannot make the horses properly because he was cut off due to snow cancer; ③ since the construction site of this case is adjacent to the road and there are no separate entrances, it was virtually impossible for the defendant to prevent the entrance of the construction site of this case; ④ the defendant was paid wages pushed away from the construction site of this case at the construction site of this case at the time of this case at the time of January 6, 2017. In light of such circumstances, the defendant did not find the construction site of this case at the construction site of this case as stated in the judgment of the court below on January 6, 2017, and there is no reason to believe that there is no illegality in the judgment of the court below that the defendant merely suffered losses from the victim D, and there is no other error in the law as stated in the judgment of the court below.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant also argued to the same effect as the grounds for appeal on this part in the lower court, and the lower court stated that “The witness G of the Do governor which was an organization established under the jurisdiction of the lower court shall not be deemed to be a large sound while searching the relevant construction site several times with other persons from January 3, 2017 to June of the same month, thereby preventing the Defendant from entering the entrance and exit of the relevant construction site, or putting the people under his/her care against those persons.”

The court made a statement to the effect that she interfered with frighting, etc., and that she failed to return to the her body. The statements are consistent and specific, and thus credibility is consistent, and the judgment of the court below in fact G is made once on January 2, 2017.

arrow