beta
Text
1. Defendant F, G, H, and I shall each of the plaintiffs A, KRW 4 million, KRW 1 million to the plaintiff B, and KRW 1 million to the plaintiff C, respectively.
Reasons
1. The following facts can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties, or facts in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 30 (including each number number); and (b) the fact inquiry results with respect to the customer support team of the BGF test; (c) the Plaintiff's statement is consistent; (d) the sales of the CU convenience is consistent with the Plaintiffs' assertion; (e) even based on the CU convenience statement, it is difficult to see that the Plaintiff voluntarily purchased drinking water, etc. to L, M, N, N, etc.; and (e) according to CCTV video (each subparagraph of evidence No. 14 of the A), it is difficult to see that M, N, andO were assaulted with the Plaintiff; and (e) it is difficult to see that the behavior was merely occurred in the old process, each of the above facts stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including each number).
Plaintiff
A is a student who was enrolled in the third grade of P elementary school in 2015, and the plaintiff B and C are the parents of the plaintiff.
B. In 2015, L, M, N, andO, a student who was enrolled in the fourth grade of P elementary school, committed school violence as described below against the Plaintiff.
1) At around 15:30 on July 1, 2015, L, M, and N demanded the Plaintiff to threaten the Plaintiff with BB guns, and to sell drinking water. The Plaintiff, who drinking hot water, sold drinking water equivalent to KRW 6,00,00, to them. 2) M, N, andO, around 12:30 on July 3, 2015, the Plaintiff’s face, distribution, right buck, and bucks, which passed by being pushed up at the vicinity of the school athletic classroom, such as the sports site, etc., and caused the Plaintiff’s impact, such as the upper part of the right side, the frame, and the inner part, etc.
On July 6, 2015, M and N: 13:40 on July 6, 2015, in a group, the Plaintiff was suffering from her horses by reporting that there was Plaintiff A. However, Plaintiff A driven away from Plaintiff A.