Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants were engaged in a taxi to drink and return home together with the company fee.

1. At around 00:15 on July 26, 2018, Defendant A: (a) was placed on the street in front of the D Bank located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with the rear door that was corrected by approaching the patrol vehicle parked in the signal signal line, and (b) the slope F belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station E zone located in the patrol vehicle, who was on the patrol vehicle, called “this vehicle is a cab, not a taxi, but a car patrol”; (c) continued to go on the road, and (d) on the road, the said F, who was under the patrol vehicle, was fleeped with the shoulder of the F, and carried the f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s h.

As above, the Defendant interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of police officers’ crimes, and other public peace and the maintenance of order.

2. Defendant B, at the same date, at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, sought access to the patrol vehicle with the said Party A, and go through a check, intending to assault F, who was a police officer, and go to go to the direction of the said F, as in the preceding paragraph, and tried to assault F, a police officer, to go to the police officer, as in the preceding paragraph, and to go to the police officer, and to go to the direction of the said F. The said G was obstructed by body and hand.

As above, the Defendant interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of police officers’ crimes, and other public peace and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Application of the respective statutory statements of the witness F, G, H, I, and J

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes and the Defendants who choose a penalty:

1. Judgment on the assertion by Defendant B and the defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The argument.