A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 25, 2015, the defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Busan District Court on March 25, 2015.

4.2 The above judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant was the actual operator of E in Busan, which was the representative of the defendant's father-gu, Busan, his father-gu.

On October 2012, 2012, the Defendant reported accounting and other duties at the office of the said company to a police officer.

On October 12, 201, in the name of the Director of the Korean garment Test Research Institute issued previously to C, the date of the self-examination test report was ordered to be changed arbitrarily.

Accordingly, C added the paper printed on October 12, 201, which read “the date of the above test result” and forged the test result in the name of the president of the Korean garment Test Institute by copying it.

The Defendant, around November 7, 2012, posted the forged test report at the Gun headquarters located in the Gun headquarters located in the Gun headquarters located in the Chang-si, Chang-si, Changwon-si, to an inspector belonging to the Gun headquarters where it is impossible to identify the name of the forgery, as the document was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, forged the test result in the name of the director of the Korea Bath Test Research Institute, which is a private document to prove facts for the purpose of exercising, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. A copy of the results of examination forged;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire into criminal records and report criminal investigations (report attached to the same type of court records of the suspect);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 231, 234, and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (no defect exists in the quality of the product supplied by the defendant, and no economic benefit acquired from the crime of this case is significant, and the first head of the judgment that became final and conclusive.