logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.10.22 2012가단31552
손해배상
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 7,782,300 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from April 12, 201 to October 22, 2013.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates the E, Water Hands Association (hereinafter in this case, referred to as the “Water Hands Association”) on the ground buildings located adjacent to the G Repair Center (hereinafter in this case, and Defendant C is a person who operates the G Repair Center (hereinafter in this case, referred to as the “ Repair Center”) on the F Ground Building located adjacent to the instant water gate, and Defendant B is a child of Defendant C.

B. On April 12, 2011, at around 21:20, a fire, the cause of which is not known, occurred, and the goods displayed inside 7.2 square meters and interior of the instant water body building, and copicing car were set up. Around 21:20, a 35 square meters and a sprink, etc. out of 105.6 square meters of the instant repair center building.

(hereinafter referred to as the “fire of this case”).

On the fire of this case, the fire fighting team, which is the competent fire fighting team, was found to be "the fire reported by H, which had passed the front of the water assembly of this case, to make the autopsy abundance inside the water assembly of this case, on-site investigation was conducted, the fire fighting team near the storage place such as electric equipment, etc. inside the water assembly of this case, and there seems to be a stimulation of the expansion of combustion from this place to the whole inside and adjacent Dongs of the water assembly of this case, and there is no special source of combustion, considering that the inside of the water assembly of this case is seriously collapsed and there is no special source of combustion, the fire fighting team of this case was presumed to be a fire that was burned within the water assembly of this case and is burned into the whole inside of the water assembly of this case and an adjacent building."

The building of this case was made up of the light metal structure, light steel framed, steel framed roof, sand position plate structure, and inside the building at the time there was combustible materials such as plastic products, plastic products, plates, etc.

[Evidence] The evidence evidence evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 6, 11, 18 through 20 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 and images, witness I, J, and H's testimony, the inquiry results on the fact-finding with the chief of the Jinan Police Station of this Court, and arguments.

arrow