logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2010. 11. 11. 선고 2010두15872 판결
커튼월 공법으로 시공된 경우 발코니 면적은 전용면적에 포함될 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2009Nu36295 (Law No. 25, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seoul Administrative Court 2008Gudan4056 ( October 20, 2009)

Title

Where a balcony is constructed by a public method, the balcony area shall not be included in the exclusive area.

Summary

In trading multi-family housing, the balcony area is recognized as a service area, and the customs office has established the practice of making the section of exclusive ownership entered in the public register as the taxation data, and it is generally accepted by the taxpayers.

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

44 44 44 44 44 45 44 444 64 44

The appeal is dismissed.

쇠鹬 쇠鹬 3000 쇠鹬 3000

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant does not include the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or it is recognized that there is no reason. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act.

arrow