Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. [2018 high-level 53] The defendant is a person who runs a construction business as a resident of B apartment house C, and the complainant D is the same representative of apartment house.

At around 22:30 on April 12, 2017, the Defendant openly insulting the complainant by openly referring the complainant who had completed a regular meeting of the occupant in front of the B apartment household located in Silung-si, to the larger interest called “Woo Chewing years and sick years.”

2. [2018 high-level 187] The Defendant is a resident of B apartment, and the victim E is a Dong representative of the same apartment.

At around 22:00 on April 12, 2017, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by speaking the victim’s representative meeting of the tenant located in front of the Bag apartment located in Silung-si, 2017 as “I see, see, she see, she see, she see, she see, she she.” On May 10, 2017, the Defendant attended the meeting of the representative of the tenant at the meeting of the tenant at the meeting of the tenant at the above elderly on May 22:0, 2017, and expressed to the victim “I mari Police” and “I see, she she.”

Summary of Evidence

[2018 High Court Decision 53]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. A regular recording file (2018 fixed53) on April 2017;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant completed the meeting of the representative of the occupants in front of the apartment apartment household at around 22:0 to 22:30 on April 12, 2017, but did not have any desire to take part in the meeting. On May 10, 2017, the defendant was present at the meeting of the representative of the occupants at the above apartment apartment complex at around 22:00 on May 10, 2017, but did not take a bath to E on the job.