Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From August 19, 2012, the Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking nullification of the election of the council of occupants' representatives against the said representative meeting, among the members of the C Apartment representative meeting, and the Defendant appealed against the said judgment on August 14, 2013 from the Seoul High Court, which was the appellate court, against the said representative meeting, and appealed against the said judgment on behalf of the representative meeting.

On the other hand, the Defendant requested the representative meeting to pay the litigation cost of the above lawsuit, but decided not to pay the litigation cost at the representative meeting on October 7, 2013, and on October 30, 2013, the Defendant applied for a payment order against the C apartment occupant representative meeting at the Seoul Southern District Court for the payment order of KRW 5410,000,000 for trial cost on the ground that the Defendant had paid the litigation cost of the above lawsuit to the C apartment occupant representative meeting, and entered the representative of the meeting as the Defendant.

On November 8, 2013, the Defendant revised the representative meeting, the other party to the payment order, from the Defendant to the audit E, to the Seoul Southern District Court. On the 15th of the same month, the Seoul Southern District Court issued the payment order to the above representative meeting as requested by the Defendant.

The defendant decided that the payment order should not be reported to the representative meeting when the payment order is served to the above E, and that the period of objection against the payment order should be over two weeks, and the payment order should be finalized.

Accordingly, the defendant around the 18th day of the same month, at the management office office in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, ordered the above E to “if the plaintiff and the defendant are the same, the court documents will not be served. In order to serve documents, the delivery of documents is required by the substitute, and the delivery of documents to the management office would be avoided because the sender was changed to E’s audit,” and the F calls it to E, and the attached documents must be delivered to E, without opening the payment order delivered to the representative meeting of the wife on the 19th day of the same month, and then confirmed the opening of the payment order received by G.