The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On December 201, 201, the Defendant, the Dong 102 representative of the facts charged in the instant case, damaged the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by speaking to the president E of the above apartment, despite the fact that the victims C and D were fake and that the Defendant did not have any useful facts in the above apartment’s budget for the elderly’s house with the above apartment’s female budget, the victim C and D’s 2 million won of the above apartment.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are defamation by publicly alleging false facts, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Articles 307(2) and 312(2) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim C and D submitted a written withdrawal of complaint containing the intent of not wanting to punish the Defendant to this court on December 27, 2012, the prosecution of the instant case was dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.