A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A crime committed on May 17, 2012;

A. On May 17, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) based on the mobile phone sales store of “C” located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City and opened the mobile phone (E) via the mobile phone sales store; (b) stated the “application for subscription” and “A written application for Schlage /LTE draft discount program” as “D” in the column for the purchaser’s column and the applicant’s column; and (c) stated D’s private person adjacent to the name.

In this respect, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, forged two copies of the application form for mobile phone purchase in the name of D, a private document.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in the foregoing A, sent the forged application form by facsimile as if the 2nd head of the forged application form was a document duly formed, respectively, to an employee who was aware of the forgery at the same time and place as described in the foregoing paragraph.

(c)

The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act by illegally using another person’s resident registration number by arbitrarily recording the resident registration number of D in the application form for mobile phone entrance in the name of D at the same time and place as the above paragraph.

2. A crime committed on June 11, 2012;

A. On June 11, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) made an application form for the purchase column of “F” and “F” column of “W” and “F” column of the applicant (subscriber) by stealing F’s mobile phone sales store located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City by taking advantage of F’s name from the mobile phone sales store; and (b) made a private person F on the name side of the applicant’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the two copies of the application form for mobile phone purchase in F, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as described in the above A., sent the forged application form by facsimile as if the two were a document duly formed, respectively.