Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape, etc.) at the Seoul High Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 29, 2017.

1. The Defendant is a person who had worked as an employee at the “C” (on-line sales store) located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from August 2013 to October 2015.

On October 24, 2015, the Defendant, at the above “C” office, filed an application for membership of F mobile phone in the name of D without D’s consent, stating “D” and “G” in the customer column of D’s application form, and signed on the name side of D’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile phone purchase in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant sent the falsified mobile phone entrance application form to E-related employees, who were aware of the forgery at the time and place mentioned in the above 1.1. Paragraph, and exercised it as if they were duly formed.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant sent the forged mobile phone subscription application at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph 1.1. At the same time, and at the same time, the Defendant deceiving the victim as if the Defendant was properly entrusted with the opening of the mobile phone from D, and then acquired it by deceiving the victim. The Defendant received the amount equivalent to KRW 99,900 from the injured party of the mobile phone market price of KRW 99,90.

B. The Defendant, at the above “C” office on September 8, 2015, sent a forged mobile phone subscription application in the name of H to the victim E, which was submitted by H while opening a mobile phone at the above sales store in the past, and deceiving the victim as if the Defendant was properly entrusted with the opening of the mobile phone from H, thereby deceiving the victim as if he was properly entrusted with the opening of the mobile phone.