1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the reasoning of the lower court regarding the instant case is as follows. As such, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited on the ground that the reasoning of the first instance judgment is identical to that of the lower court, and Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited as it is. 2. On February 2, the part of the first instance judgment, “the instant legal entity” is deemed to be “the instant law firm.” On the 8th page 11 of the first instance judgment, “the first instance judgment,” and “the first instance judgment,” which reads “the first instance judgment,” and “the second instance judgment,” which added “the first instance judgment,” “the first instance judgment,” which added “the first instance judgment,” “the first instance judgment,” and “the first instance judgment, first instance judgment, second instance judgment,” and “the first instance judgment, second instance judgment, first instance judgment, second instance judgment,” to “the first instance judgment, second instance judgment,” and second appeal execution.

No. 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “loan” of No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance is regarded as “a claim arising from a loan of funds.”

In the first instance judgment, the instant disciplinary action in the first instance judgment No. 17 is deemed to be the “instant disciplinary action.”

The judgment of the court of first instance stated in Section 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance that "attached Form 1" is "attached Form 1" (in addition, "non-appeal" column). 3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is without merit.