A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Employment Security Act is a person who, from March 9, 2012 to June 10, 2013, has operated a “D” termed “D” with seven smuggling from the Seoul Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 2nd floor from March 9, 2012.

On March 2012, the Defendant posted a job offer advertisement on the Internet job-seeking site, “Ambane,” and “Ammon,” in order to recruit female employees who engage in obscene acts in the said “Dkic”.

Around November 30, 2012, the Defendant employed a job offer advertisement and interview E, who found the said kis, and had a female find the said kis, and had a female do kis with an unspecified number of male guests, and had a male guest talk with his/her body, such as his/her chest, and engage in self-defense on December 2012, 201, and Haman F, Gaman on January 2013, 201, and Habman on February 26, 2013, respectively, employed Ha to engage in obscene acts as above.

As a result, the Defendant recruited workers, such as E, for the purpose of having them find a job where obscene acts are conducted.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Regulation of Amusement Businesses Affecting Public Morals and the Regulation of Amusement Businesses Affecting Public Morals by employing I and J as an employee, including the head of the office of business, and operating the said “D key room”. On February 27, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 140,000 from K who was found to be a customer at the above kis room on February 27, 2013, and caused the female employees H and kis in the four smuggling room, and arranged the act of obscenity by allowing the female employees to talk with their body parts, such as their chests, etc. from March 9, 2012 to June 10, 2013. In return, the Defendant received KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and received as consideration for obscenity.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with I and J, observe the rules of customs such as arranging obscene acts at a place where the amusement business is conducted.