beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Supreme Court Decision 2011Du28974 ( October 15, 2012)
Title
The action is subject to dismissal, which was brought for the reasons rejected even if the judgment of the same disposition was rendered.
Summary
"If the Supreme Court judged that the argument on the grounds of appeal falls under the grounds of appeal under the grounds of appeal under Article 4 of the "Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure for Appeal" and dismissed the appeal without further deliberation, it shall not be deemed that the judgment on the important matters that may affect the judgment is omitted" (Contents of the judgment)
Cases
2014Bed 101 Global Income and Revocation of Disposition
Plaintiff (Reexamination Plaintiff)
Park AA
Defendant (Re-Defendant)
head of Dongjak-gu Tax Office
Judgment Subject to Judgment
Supreme Court Decision 2011Du28974 Decided March 15, 2012
Imposition of Judgment
June 26, 2014
Text
The request for retrial is dismissed.
The litigation costs for retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
We examine the reasons for the request for retrial.
Article 451(1)9 of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 851, Jun. 26, 2008; Act No. 8554, Jun. 26, 2008; Act No. 8885, Jun. 26, 2008; Act No. 8879, Jun. 26, 2008; Act No. 88855, Feb. 29, 2008; Act No. 88885, Feb. 26, 2008; Act No. 8887, Feb. 29, 2008; Act No. 8855, Feb. 26, 2008).