beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case are the same as the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to further determination of the Plaintiff’s assertion that focuses on this case to this court. Therefore, this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s priority assertion
A. The summary of the assertion indicated that “the Plaintiff received 700 million won from the construction company under the pretext of prosecutorial investigation, and thereby replaced from K to the candidate for National Assembly members,” with respect to the Plaintiff who submitted the application for support of the FF president on September 15, 2017 through the instant article.”
In addition, in light of the fact that Defendant C did not properly and fully investigate the article about the theory of acceptance of bribe 700 million won and distorted and distorted the article of the previous L Games, etc., there is no justifiable reason to believe such fact as true. Since the Defendants’ purpose of slandering the Plaintiff in light of the fact that the Plaintiff posted the article of this case, which is one coloring the intent of criticism immediately after the Plaintiff supported the president of the F Corporation, the Defendants’ drafting and reporting of the article of this case cannot be deemed as a tort that defames the Plaintiff’s reputation.
B. (1) With respect to the existence of a statement of fact alleged by the Plaintiff (A) in the article of this case, the fact that “G” was reported as follows: “(A) on the recommendation of the KJ re-election in 1999 immediately after the arrival of the article of this case from “(A) and was replaced by the counter-explosion of K at the time of the re-election. One of the reasons why K took place against the former member at the time, one of the reasons why K received money from the construction company and received 70 million won on the condition that K would not enter the prosecution to investigate the case.”