logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.06 2017고단8983
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the Defendant who was a reporter of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building B and the “D” Internet newspaper.

No person shall conceal any false information openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame any other person, thereby impairing the reputation of any other person.

On September 18, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 700,000 from a reporter room located in the National Assembly of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City as the doctor of the National Assembly. In fact, the Victim E received KRW 700,000 from a construction business entity under the pretext of prosecutorial investigation, and for that reason, the Defendant was subject to the suspicion of acceptance of bribe of KRW 700,000 from F for the reason that he was replaced by F for the reason that he was replaced by F for the reason that he was replaced from the candidate for the National Assembly member, and was replaced by F for the reason that he was replaced by F for the reason that he was found to have received bribe of KRW 70,000,00 from F for the reason that he was replaced by F for the reason that he was replaced by the candidate for the National Assembly member.

The candidate was replaced by the opposition of the F (the present K Party).

One of the reasons why F was against E member was raised was that E member received KRW 700 million on the condition that E member came to enter the prosecution investigation by receiving money from the construction company.

(b) A person in charge of a passport who has requested anonymous is still in material qualification requirements, and a person suspected to have received a bribe in order to see corruption is appointed to the president of the G Corporation who is classified as a general class, the morality would be a good reputation.

(B) The Internet article was prepared and posted with the content of “afterward.”

The purpose of this is to slander the victim.

arrow