logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.09.28 2016고합351
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an assistant officer of the 19th National Assembly member D, who belongs to C Party, and D related to the re-election of the old market scheduled on April 13, 2016, from March 1, 2016 to March 1, 2016

3. 2. C. Although there was no fact that the electors of the 20th election district immediately after the competition did not combine themselves with E that was decided as a candidate via the competition, D was willing to publish a false article as if D exercised influence on the electors of the 20th election district, and to send the article to F, a secretary of the National Assembly D, in writing, by allowing F, who is a secretary of the 20th election district, to be a candidate for the election district in the 20th election of the National Assembly member, to be perceived as a person having influence on the electors of the election district.

1. On March 4, 2016, at around 16:00, the Defendant called “D Council member’s regional office located in the second floor of the G Building” to the effect that “D Council member sent to I, a representative director of the KG in charge of the Internet newspaper company and sent pictures to the effect that “D Council member sent to the effect that he was combined with the scambling of the scams immediately after the scaming of the scams,” and that “I will see the scams of the scams, such as the scambling of the scams and the scambling of the scams, focusing on D Council members, by making the scambling of the D Council member’s regional office in preparation for the opening of the D Council member’s election office.”

이에 I은 ‘ 경 선 후 D 의원이 경선 탈락자들을 단합시켰다’ 는 피고인의 말을 사실로 오인하여 2016. 3. 4. 17:00 경 구리시 J에 있는 ㈜H 사무실에서, “ 구리 C 정당 20년 만에 이변 E, 시장 만들자! 경선후보들 똘똘” 이라는 제목 하에 ‘D 의원이 나서 E 후보자가 사실상 공천이 확정된 후 경선에 참여했던 후보들을 설득시키고 화합시키면서 E 후보자를 중심으로 경선에 참여했던 후보들이 단합하게 되었다’ 는 내용의 기사를 작성하여 인터넷에 게재함으로써, 피고인은...

arrow