logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.04.08 2015나104594
건물명도
Text

1. The part against the defendant B in the judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a juristic person established for the purpose of designing, developing, manufacturing, etc. small electric mortars and hair control devices for the application of automobiles, and the Defendant National Metal Trade Union A branch (hereinafter “Defendant branch”) composed of the Plaintiff’s employees is Daejeon-dong Branch A branch of the Korea Metal Trade Union, which is composed of the Plaintiff’s employees, and the Defendant National Metal Trade Union (hereinafter “Defendant Metal Trade Union”) is an industrial trade union of a national scale comprised of the employees engaged in the metal industry as its constituent members, and Defendant B is the head of the Defendant Branch.

On February 9, 1996, the Plaintiff completed registration of preservation of ownership on the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) constructed on the land located at the seat of the Plaintiff, and transferred the factory, provided the original company-level trade union with the portion of 128 square meters inside the pertinent building (hereinafter “instant office”) connected in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, as trade union office in order to be free of charge, among the instant buildings, and provided the Defendant metal trade union with the instant office free of charge as a trade union office (hereinafter “instant loan”) upon conversion into an industrial trade union around 201, and then, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant metal trade union with the instant office free of charge as a trade union office (hereinafter “instant loan”). The Defendant Branch occupied and used the instant office.

The office of this case is located in the building of this case, which is the plaintiff's factory, and the plaintiff and the defendant metal labor union Article 13 of the collective agreement to be applied to the plaintiff and the defendant metal labor union shall actively cooperate in the provision of part of the building and equipment necessary for the business at the request of the union.

“The Plaintiff, on October 8, 2014, declared that the instant loan for use was terminated and that the Plaintiff sought the delivery of the instant office.” The Plaintiff reached Defendant Metal Trade Union on October 8, 2014.

The plaintiff.

arrow