1. The Defendants’ respective points out of the building indicated in the separate sheet to each of the Plaintiff are indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person established for the purpose of designing, developing, manufacturing, etc. small electric mortars and hair control devices for the application of automobiles. The Defendant National Metal Trade Union A branch (hereinafter “Defendant Branch”) composed of the Plaintiff’s employees is Daejeon-B branch A branch of the Korea Metal Trade Union, and the Defendant National Metal Trade Union (hereinafter “Defendant Metal Trade Union”) is an industrial trade union of a national scale comprised of employees engaged in the metal industry. Defendant B is the head of the Defendant Branch.

B. On February 9, 1996, the Plaintiff completed registration of preservation of ownership as to the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) constructed on the land located at the seat of the Plaintiff, and transferred the factory, provided the original company-level trade union with the portion of 128 square meters (hereinafter “instant office”) of the attached sheet in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the instant buildings to be used as trade union offices in order, and provided the Defendant metal trade union with free use of the pertinent office as a trade union office (hereinafter “instant office”) upon conversion into an industrial trade union around 2001. However, the Plaintiff occupied and used the instant office as a trade union office (hereinafter “instant loan for use”).

C. The office of this case is located in the building of this case, which is the plaintiff's factory, and the plaintiff and the defendant metal labor union Article 13 of the collective agreement to be applied to the plaintiff and the defendant metal labor union shall actively cooperate in the provision of part of the building and equipment necessary for the business at the request of the union. The office of this case is only stipulated in ", but did not set

The Plaintiff is against Defendant Metal Trade Union on October 8, 2014, which contained an expression of intent that “the Plaintiff terminated the instant loan for use and sought the delivery of the instant office.”