A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete 40 hours of sexual assault treatment programs.

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Busan High Court for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 26, 2016.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) respectively.

On February 11, 2016, the Defendant offered that he had had a name influor and sexual intercourse with a woman who became aware of through “D”, a smartphone-making app, and offered that “one million won is defective in the terms and conditions of the test”. On the same day, around 19:34 of the F Hospital located in Chang-si, Changwon-si E, Changwon-si, the Defendant provided the above name influor and sexual intercourse with the above name in the second influorial room located in G in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and around 19:34 of the same day, he provided the above name influor.

B. Around 14:00 on February 12, 2016, the Defendant proposed that “A juncing with J and J, which was known through “I,” a smartphone hosting app,” and “A 130,000 won, is defective.” On the same day, around 14:53 on the same day, the Defendant provided J 30,00 won to J, 30,000 won to K in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, a member of Changwon-si.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, took photographs of the body of another person, respectively, which may cause sexual humiliation or sense of shameing, using mechanical devices with the following camera functions:

On February 11, 2016, around 19:34, the Defendant: (a) opened the victim’s name in a hythothic studio room on the second floor of the Hmothel as indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1; (b) opened his Samsung Talthot 4 mobile phone device on his galthothr before a sexual intercourse with the Defendant, and divided the victim’s 33-minutes into the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant without the victim’s consent; (c) taken the video images between 17 minutes of the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant in the same manner at around 20:09 on the same day; and (d) the victim’s sexual intercourse with the Defendant in the same manner.