1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the reasoning of the court of first instance is written or added as follows, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(The court of first instance, even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance presented by the plaintiff, deemed the evidence to be submitted to this court, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff in the grounds for appeal, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff). The court of first instance dismissed the "No. 25, 2017" as "No. 13, 2017 (No. 33)" as "No. 13, 2017 (No. 33)."

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance was entered into, and shall be added to, the following:

At that time, N created a pledge (the pledge amount of KRW 325 million) on the insurance claim under the above fire insurance, and the plaintiff consented thereto (Evidence No. 16, No. 37, the plaintiff), following the third 16th 16th of the judgment of the first instance.

Around February 2019, the Seoul Central District Court applied for a payment order of KRW 248,472,874 of the above insurance money to Defendant B, and was sentenced to a favorable judgment on June 27, 2019 (Seoul Central District Court 2019Da5071239), and the defendant B filed an appeal and is currently in progress in the appellate trial (Seoul Central District Court 2019Na46956 (No. 35,36) (No. 2019Na466) of the first instance judgment, the following is added.

The following are the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, “The first instance court’s report on the fire site investigation report (No. 19 certificate) is that “the underground floor of the I-dong building was investigated as having no structural problem, but the first and second floors were transferred to a heat directly.” The second instance judgment of the first instance is against the legislative intent.”