1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reasoning of the court of first instance is written or added as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 42

2. Parts used or added;

A. After the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, Champ Co., Ltd., which is a land-type distributor, entered into a lease agreement with B on December 2009, setting lease deposit amounting to KRW 20 million and monthly rent of KRW 8 million with respect to the third floor of the instant building. The land-type processing chain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nice distribution”) entered into a lease agreement with B on the second floor of the instant building at around that time.

B. The evidence No. 2 of the first instance judgment of the first instance is added following the “Evidence No. 3” of the first instance judgment.

C. The third and fourth instances of the judgment of the court of first instance change “Defendant” to “Defendant, Non-Party Company, and Nice Distribution (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”).”

Part 3 of Part 10 of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: â………â……â…â…â…â…â…â…â…â…â…â…â…ââââââââ

E. On the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant’s employees of the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance, who are the lessee, are the employees of the Defendant, etc. who are the lessee, and the “employee of the Defendant” of the eighth part, who are the employees of the Defendant, etc., are replaced by the “Defendant, etc.” and the

3. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.