All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the statement in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the use of or addition to

(The court of first instance, based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, found the facts of the court of first instance and its determination are justifiable, and there are no errors as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs). The second instance court of first instance, based on the "Gremanological Landscape" of the second 19 and the fifth 14, all of the "Gremanological Landscape" in the second 19 and the fifth 14.

Even though the second part of the first instance judgment, “only a minute was proceeded” in the first part of the second part of the first instance judgment from “09:00 to the third part of “09:0,000,” the part was “08:45 Jindo-Jindo-ro 5cm-2, an embryobat-2, and the 09:00 Jindo-Jindo-ro was completely opened, only one minute of the fetus strength was proceeded.”

The 3rd, 4, 20 and 4th, 2, and 10th, respectively, shall be subject to all the "Megrology" in the judgment of the first instance.

The 6th, 9, 10th and 19th of the judgment of the first instance shall all be subject to all "the occurrence of mergal guns" with "the damage to mergal guns."

Each "this court" in the third, third, 9, 10 and 6 of the judgment of the first instance shall be applied to all "the first instance court".

The results of the 7th instance judgment of the first instance court shall be added "the results of each request for the supplementation and supplementation of medical records to the Chief of the Seoul National University Hospital and the Chief of the I Hospital of this Court".

Part VI (6) of the first instance judgment shall be added as follows.

In the course of the delivery of the instant case, the Plaintiffs asserted that the Plaintiff C’s medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital should have taken into account only the king subdivision because the Plaintiff’s opening price was suspended for more than two hours, which is a risk factor of spawnsan and spawn damage.

The plaintiff C, the plaintiff C, the E of 05.