1. Defendant E is within the scope of the property inherited from net G (H) :

A. The plaintiff A is KRW 327 million.

1. Evidence of 100,00,000 G 1/11 May 14, 2011, 201, evidence of 10,000,000 G 1/30,000 G 1/37,00,000 I evidence of 1/4 of April 2, 2012, 327,000,000, 0000 G 1/30, 000, 1/300, 000, 1/300, 000, 1/300, 200, 200, 200, 200, 1/300, 200, 1/300, 200, 1/300, 200, 000 G 1/300, 205, 2000 G 1/300, 2005

A. G operated to receive money from the Plaintiffs and intended to receive a profit, and the Plaintiffs received money as follows.

B. G died on April 23, 2014, and his/her wife and children inherited the property.

However, Defendant E, the wife of G, filed a report on the inheritance limited recognition (Ji Government District Court High Court High Court High Court High Court Decision 2014Ra767), and the court accepted the report on June 27, 2014.

L, M, and N, who are children of G, filed a report of renunciation of inheritance (the High Government District Court Decision 2014Ra768), and the court accepted the report on June 27, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10 evidence, Eul 1-9 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As to the claim against Defendant E

A. The plaintiffs asserts that the money mentioned in the above paragraph (1) is guaranteed to the principal and invested in "G".

On the other hand, Defendant E introduced the J (Credit Investment Experts) to the plaintiffs, thereby making investments in money to the "J" by the plaintiffs, and G merely delivers the plaintiffs' money to the J.

B. 1) The facts acknowledged earlier, and the following circumstances, which were known through the testimony of witnesses, P and J, and the purport of the entire pleadings (in full view of the facts and decisions recognized, the Plaintiffs invested the money stated in paragraph 1 above to “G” and G promised to return the principal of the investment.

The principal shall be returned.