1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part concerning Defendant E is modified as follows:

Defendant E is from the net G (H).

1. On January 14, 201, 200,000,000 G on May 11, 2011, 201, when the Plaintiff’s basic facts were 10,00,000 G on the date of the Plaintiff’s account (the original) and the total of 327,000,000 G on April 2, 201, 200,000 B on April 2, 201, 327,000,000 B on February 20, 200, 2000 G on February 8, 2012, 200, total of 425,000,000 G on April 26, 200, 2000 on the aggregate of 425,000,000 G on June 30, 200, 2008;

A. The Plaintiffs, upon receiving the recommendation of investment from G, the head of the branch office of Defendant FFFF branch, remitted the following money:

(hereinafter referred to as "investment of this case"). (b)

G Deceased on April 23, 2014, the Defendant E and his wife succeeded to the property.

Defendant E reported the inheritance limited approval on May 21, 2014 and accepted June 27, 2014.

(Y) All children of G were reported on May 21, 2014 and accepted on June 27, 2014 on the renunciation of inheritance.

(J) Goyang Branch of the District Court 2014Ra768). 【Ground for Recognition】 There is no dispute, Gap’s 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, Eul’s 1 through 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Claim against Defendant E

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) since they invested the instant investment funds to G under the agreement on guaranteeing the principal of G, Defendant E, its heir, is obligated to pay the instant investment funds to the plaintiffs.

B) As if G made an investment in the agricultural products guaranteed by Nonghyup, it is liable for damages arising from tort since it deceivings the Plaintiffs as if it were to make an investment in the said products, and acquired the instant investment funds. (2) Defendant E) G introduced J as an investment expert to the Plaintiffs, and only delivered the Plaintiffs’ investment funds to J, and there was neither an agreement to guarantee the principal of investment nor a deception for the Plaintiffs. (b) G entered into a principal guarantee agreement.

This is a good custom and other act of investment to commit an offense in violation of Article 3 of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission.