Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Seized evidence shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

No person, other than a handler, shall possess, possess, use, transport, manage, import, export, manufacture, prepare, administer, administer, administer, administer, investigate, trade, assist in the trade of, or provide narcotics or psychotropic drugs.

1. On June 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) administered a single-time medication in a vehicle parked in an area where a large quantity of divers are densely concentrated, around 19:00, in an smuggling-si, C; and (b) in a single-time injection method by dilution a large quantity of divers with water into the divers.

2. On June 29, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) on June 29, 2017, in a vehicle parked in an area densely densely densely populated with DNA located in C around 19:00, and (b) on a single-time basis, administered one-time medication by dilution a large amount of mert cloids into the bloodline with a single-time injection method.

3. On August 15, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime around August 15, 2017: (a) around 08:00, at the small room of the Defendant’s residence located in E, at the small room of the Defendant’s residence; (b) at the plastic bags that contained and stored the cryptian, the Defendant stored a small amount of crypt cryp cryp crys in a plastic bag that was stored in the cryp cryp cryp

The defendant of "2017 Highest 429" is a person engaged in driving a FSP car.

On July 31, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 16:25, while driving the H private-distance intersection in the G in the Syang city, the Defendant proceeded from the I apartment site to the Cinru apartment site.

At the time, the crosssection of the defendant's running direction was installed a red flickering, so in such a case, after examining whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely enter the crosssection by temporarily stopping the motor vehicle before entering the intersection, and then, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to safely enter the crosssection, the defendant was negligent in not making a temporary stop, and the defendant passed the crosssection from the left side of the defendant's running direction to the right side.