1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 17, 2007, while working as an employee belonging to the open timber industry, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury (hereinafter “existing injury”) caused by the brupted cut of the front part of the front part of the brush, the brupted part of the brush, the brupted part of the front part of the brush, the brupted part of the brush, the frush part of the brush, the frupted part of the brush, and the stress disorder after external wound.

B. From around that time to August 31, 2012, the Plaintiff approved the instant accident from the Defendant as an industrial accident, and filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant after receiving treatment for the previous injury, and the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s final disability grade No. 5 subparag. 2 of the disability grade (i.e., a person who lost his/her inner arms from his/her parts above his/her fingers), and the “overcoming stress disability” portion of the previous injury in the disability grade No. 14 subparag. 10 of the disability grade, respectively, and determined the Plaintiff’s final disability grade No. 5. 2 of the disability grade.

C. On the other hand, in the case of revocation of the revocation of the revocation of the additional approval for the injury or disease of Seoul Administrative Court 2012-Gu 9935, the competent division presented a recommendation to the effect that the defendant should approve the "the disability of the injury or disease caused by the second injury or disease" as an additional injury based on the result of the medical record appraisal entrustment, and the defendant decided to accept the recommendation, and the defendant decided to approve the "the disability caused by the second injury or disease caused by the second injury or disease" (hereinafter "the additional injury or disease of this case"), and the plaintiff submitted the written withdrawal of the lawsuit

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a new claim for disability benefits to the Defendant on February 8, 2013, and the Defendant, on February 20, 2013, determined that there was no disability benefits to be paid in addition to the same disability grade according to the medical opinion of the Defendant advisory society (hereinafter “instant disposition”).