1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 원고는 주식회사 상명에서 근무하던 중 2008. 8. 14. 발생한 업무상 재해로 ‘뇌진탕, 안면부좌상, 흉부좌상, 제12흉추체 챈스골절 및 척수 손상, 우측 슬부 및 족관절 좌상, 우측 슬관절 전방 십자인대손상, 우측 수부의 떨림, 좌측 안구 및 안와조직의 좌상, 양측 복시, 외상 후 스트레스장애’로 요양하다가 2010. 12. 31. 치료를 종결하였고, 피고에게 장해급여를 청구하였다.

B. The Defendant determined that the Plaintiff constituted class 4 of the final disability grade adjustment by suffering from the interference of the Plaintiff’s “at least 1/4 degree of labor ability of the general public (class 5) with the implementation of pleatism No. 11-12-도요 1 (class 10 applicable mutatis mutandis), stoves: the need for assistive devices for serious labor in the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves of the stoves (Class

C. On October 25, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for a disability judgment as the subject of re-determination of a disability grade, and accordingly, the Plaintiff received a special medical examination at the Korea University Medical Center Hospital. On May 16, 2014, the Defendant deliberated on the result of the above special medical examination on May 16, 2014, based on which the Plaintiff’s satise disability grade is the same as that of the previous class No. 10, and the disability grade of a bridge is the same as that of the previous class No. 12 class No. 10, but the disability grade of a psychotropic spirit is the same as that of the previous class No. 12 class No. 15 (the remainder of a serious neological disorder). Accordingly, the Plaintiff adjusted

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The plaintiff is dissatisfied with this and filed a review and a request for review, but all of them were dismissed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2, 5 evidence, Eul 3 evidence (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s labor ability or symptoms with respect to the Plaintiff’s alleged chronic disorder do not differ from the time of determining the existing disability grade, but the Defendant solely stressed the cause.