The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at around 23:00 on December 19, 2016, took a meeting, such as the victim E and F, who are members of the same workplace, within the “D cafeteria” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, and that employees, such as F, hear, “picker” to the Defendant.

H. 3 seconds later, she publicly insultingd the victim by referring to her finite finite finite finite finite finite finite and expressing a person who does not have a long-term sexual relationship.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. Submission of a written withdrawal of a complaint after filing the instant prosecution by the victim E

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;