The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

The application of the second statute is "Road Traffic Act" in the second and third directions.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against the nature of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the form of punishment) and the fact that it is not sufficiently sufficient, the punishment imposed by the court below (e.g. the fine of five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant was aware of and against the crime of this case, and the defendant was the first offender.

However, the crime of this case is committed in full view of all the circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, circumstance after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for the sentencing of this case, since the court below's punishment is not deemed to be unfair because it is too proper and too excessive, since the defendant's punishment of this case is not deemed to be unfair, since it is not reasonable, since the defendant's above assertion is without merit, since it is not reasonable to deem that the defendant's punishment of this case is too too too too proper and too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the application of Article 148-2 (2) 3 of the Road Traffic Act in Section 2 and Section 3 of the second part of the judgment of the court below is obvious that the "Article 148-2 (2) 1 of the Road Traffic Act" and Article 154 (2) and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act are erroneous errors in Article 152 (1) and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act.