The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against whom the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for six months) is against the defendant, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant is against the judgment.

However, the crime of this case is about 12 km driving car owned by the defendant under the influence of alcohol 0.198% under the influence of alcohol without the driver's license. The crime of this case is likely to be criticized for the defendant in light of the degree of blood alcohol concentration and the fact that there was an accident that the defendant's vehicle was dissatisfyed due to the failure of the defendant at the time of detection of alcohol driving of this case, and the accident that shocks the exterior wall of the building at the time of detection of drinking driving of this case. The defendant, at an investigative agency, presented objective evidence after the first driving of the defendant's wife, and reversed the defendant's statement before committing the crime, and there is no good condition after committing the crime. The defendant had already been tried after 202 years since 202, there is no reason to see that the defendant's act of driving of this case's imprisonment with prison labor and other acts of driving of this case without prison labor, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant's motive to punish the above act of driving of this case is unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is reasonable.