The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against whom the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor for six months) is against the defendant, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant is against the judgment.

However, the crime of this case is about 2 km of C cargo vehicle owned by the defendant while under the influence of 0.123% of alcohol level without a driver's license. In light of the degree of blood alcohol level and the fact that the defendant was divingd in the vehicle at the time of the detection of the drinking driving of this case, the defendant had been sentenced to 3 times of fine due to the same crime, 4 times of suspended execution, and the defendant did not know about the fact that he committed the crime of this case without being informed even though he had been under the suspension period of the execution of the same crime, the act of drinking driving and unlicensed driving should be strictly prohibited for the order of road traffic and the safety of the traffic controller, so it is necessary to cut the light of the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime of this case. Thus, the court below's assertion that the above punishment of this case is inappropriate and unreasonable, considering the following circumstances, is not reasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.