logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.24 2012고정1275
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant filed a divorce lawsuit against the victim C, and the conciliation was concluded by the Daejeon High Court 2010Reu84, and on October 12, 2010, the Defendant received the total amount of KRW 187 million from the victim on October 12, 2010, and waived the right to divide the remainder of the co-ownership property.

On December 17, 2010, the victim filed a lawsuit against the defendant on December 17, 2010 against the Daejeon District Court 2010da62502 for the name of the building owned by the victim in Geumsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

Accordingly, the Defendant, on December 20, 2010, stolen three Doyang Crops, three crypology, three 25 crypology, one television set, one air-conditioner, one washing machine, one laundr, one laundr, one funeral cryp, one cryp, one cump, three books cump, two books cump, two books cump, two craft-type food, and two cump-type E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of each of the accused in the protocol of the first, second, and fourth trial;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, including each evidence of the judgment of the defendant's assertion that the defendant did not have intention to larceny the copy of the mediation protocol, the facts constituting the crime that the defendant carried out were prepared during the marriage life with the victim and the victim did not express his/her intent to waive ownership, and the victim filed a lawsuit against the defendant against the defendant against the farm land owned by the victim in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, where the above goods were involved, and did not express his/her intention not return to the above building.

In a lawsuit claiming the above building name map of the victim, the victim asserts that the goods that the victim demanded to be taken out to the defendant through a preparatory document dated March 11, 201 are owned by the defendant. Therefore, the victim is entitled to take out the goods recorded in the facts constituting the crime of the defendant.

arrow