beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant in the facts charged is a person who was awarded a successful bid for a building located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Ma, F, and G at the auction of real estate C with the Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court, and the victim H is a person who was the father of the I who was the original owner of the above building and resided in the above building.
From December 16, 2013 to January 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had been employed by the victim H as a residence; (b) had been employed by him/her for cleaning on the ground that the inside of the said building at his/her option was low; (c) had an employment of the human body and infringed upon the victim’s residence by an influence method.
B. The Defendant causing property damage, while cleaning as mentioned in paragraph (1) at the time and place as above, destroyed the victim’s property in the aggregate amount of KRW 2,100,000,000,000,000,000 in the market value of the victim, which was the victim’s possession of the aforementioned measures, by means of piling up one blade, which is equivalent to KRW 3,50,000,00,00 in the market value, one 1,50,000,000,000 in the market value, one 3,50,000,000 won in the market value, one b., 1,70,000,000 in the market value, and two b.1,000,000,000 in the market value, by means of piling up it out of the building or putting it into a b
2. In light of the judgment, there is evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case, and there is a statement in the victim H investigative agency and this court and a photograph submitted by the victim. However, it is merely just that the victim made a statement on the part of the defendant who entered the above building at the time and made a statement, and that the victim did not directly witness it.
In addition, it is difficult to readily conclude that the above photographs alone have damaged the objects.
On December 10, 2013, the defendant entered the above building to clean up with the victim's permission, and made it clear that there was no access to or damage to the above building, and there was no proper device to correct the building at the time.