logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 10. 31. 선고 2017두52580 판결
(심리불속행) 사실과 다른 확인서에 의한 양도소득세 감면신청은 국세기본법 제47조의3 제2항이 정한 ‘부정행위’에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2017-Nu20477 (Law No. 21, 2017)

Title

The application for reduction or exemption of capital gains tax by means of false confirmation from the fact that the application falls under the "unlawful act" under Article 47-3 (2) of the Framework Act on National Taxes.

Summary

(C) Article 47-3(2) of the former Framework Act on National Taxes provides that a person who files an application for reduction or exemption of capital gains tax shall file a tax return along with an application for reduction or exemption of tax amount, as it is for the purpose of evading capital gains tax.

Related statutes

Additional tax on underreporting and overreporting under Article 47-3 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2017Du52580 Decided capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

Seocho △△△△

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2017Nu20477 Decided June 21, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

oly 31, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow