logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.10 2016고정368
주민등록법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal history (2016 High 368)

1. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) from the vehicle registration division of a vehicle at the transportation-management place located in the convenience unit of 1217, which is the 1217-time and irregular population, the Defendant had lent the agreed amount of KRW 3 million due to a traffic accident before towing; (b) the Defendant did not know the location of the victim, such as having not repaid the debt amount and having no contact; and (c) had tried to confirm the amount of his/her own car in his/her name in his/her name after changing it to the name of

The defendant presented a copy of the above resident registration certificate, along with the car sales contract prepared to the employee in charge of the vehicle registration of the traffic management office in Yongsan-si while he/she copied and stored the resident registration certificate (D) of the victim who was in an irregular manner.

Accordingly, the defendant used the victim's resident registration certificate unlawfully.

2. On July 23, 2015, the Defendant of a private document forgery indicated that the facts charged, such as “A”, “A” and “B” as the seller of the vehicle, “A” and “B” as the buyer, certificate of vehicle transfer, and application for registration of transfer of a motor vehicle, etc. on the grounds as stated in paragraph (1). However, according to the records, the Defendant is deemed to have prepared a “certificate of vehicle transfer and application for registration of transfer of a motor vehicle” in the name of “B,” and even if corrected without any modification of the indictment, the Defendant is deemed to have no impediment to the Defendant’s right to defense, and thus, the above correction is made.

set up at will for the purpose of exercising this section.

As a result, the Defendant forged the vehicle transaction contract in the name of B and the power of delegation for the registration of automobile transfer.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), has entered into a forged vehicle transaction agreement and a motor vehicle with an employee in charge of the registration of a vehicle in the transportation management office in Permitted-si in knowledge of the forgery.

arrow