Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 8, 2019, around 05:28, the Defendant discovered that there was no time at which the said frequency was closed and that there was no correction of the frequency, and that there was no correction, and that a water tank opened a water tank and a water tank opened a lid amounting to 3 mam of light equivalent to the market value of 90,000 won at that place, and stolen the property owned by the victim.

2. On December 20, 2019, around 03:46, the Defendant: (a) opened a water tank lid at the outside of the collection of the frequency in the same manner as described in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the location described in the foregoing paragraph (1) at the same time; (b) cut off the victim’s property, such as the red sea, etc., the market price of which was located therein, and stolen the victim’s property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to data on video images of each CCTV in written self-written statement of C;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions specified in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which include the following circumstances, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions specified in the instant case.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the unfavorable circumstances that the defendant agreed with the victim: the defendant agreed on December 19, 2019 with respect to the crime of this case of paragraph (1). On December 20, 2019, the following day after the agreement was reached, the defendant was stolen by taking the active terms, such as the low sea, etc., like the crime of paragraph (2). The defendant appears to have stolen the birth line, such as the luminous laver and the Red Sea, etc., in the same frequency as the crime of paragraph (2) without any special reasons (the defendant will bring about a labed portion by the investigative agency, and the stolen light will have brought about the house as food waste).