Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 01:00 on March 3, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the management of the victim D's main points by force by force, such as: (a) other customers, who used the main points by putting the beer and fright while drinking and drinking together within the "Cjuk" of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) having been doing a dispute with the drinking and drinking in the middle floor of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (c) having flowed to be frighten by a beer; and (d) having left the beer and fright, having been frightened by a beer and fright; and (d) having been engaged in a dispute with him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A investigation report (CCTV image, etc.);

1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;

1. Application of statutes, such as site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment [limited to the reasonable circumstances] show the attitude of the defendant to recognize and reflect the instant crime.

In this court, the defendant does not want to punish the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.

[Unfavorable Circumstances] In light of the background leading up to the Defendant to commit the instant crime and the specific form of the act, etc., the liability for the instant crime is not easy.

The defendant has been punished for a fine of KRW 500,000 for the crime of interference with business in 206.

In addition, in full view of the following conditions, such as the defendant's age and behavior environment, relation to the victim, motive means of crime, results of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., the sentence shall be determined as per Disposition.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, at around 01:00 on March 3, 2019, laid the beer balance, which was caused by beer’s beer’s beer back, and the Defendant was at the bottom of the beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s bet.