beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to Defendant K non-life insurance Co., Ltd., the amounting to KRW 14,389,425 and the amount pertaining thereto from December 15, 2010.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On December 15, 2010, at around 18:40 on December 15, 2010, the basic facts B driven by CA car (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), and turned to the left at the intersection of the three-distance intersection without signal, etc. in front of the E-cafeteria located in the Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, the part in front of the Plaintiff’s FF car (hereinafter “Plaintiff 1”), which was straight on the opposite side of the vehicle, was shocked by the part in front of the right-hand end of the Defendant 1’s vehicle, and thereby, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as light salt, detailed heart, etc.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). At the time of the instant accident, the speed of Defendant 1’s vehicle was 0 to 20km, and the speed of Plaintiff 1’s vehicle was 41 to 50km.
G, around 14:00 on September 23, 2012, while driving a H car (hereinafter “Defendant 2”) and driving on the K street in the front of the J Police Station located in Cheongyang-gun I, Chungcheongnamyang-gun, G concealed the back part of the Plaintiff’s LA car (hereinafter “Plaintiff 2”) in the front part of Defendant 2’s vehicle while driving on the K street in front of the J Police Station located in Cheongyang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun. As a result, the Plaintiff suffered an injury, such as Gyeong-gun, etc.
(2) Defendant Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract as to Defendant Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) with respect to Defendant 1’s vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 13 evidence, Gap 15 to 26 evidence, Eul 1 to 4 evidence, Eul 1 to 2 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, Defendant Samsung F&M is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant No. 1 accident, and Defendant Samsung F&M is liable to compensate for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant No. 2 accident.
(c).