1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 11, 2014, C driving a D dump truck (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 06:45, and driving a two-lane road at the entrance of the GIC located in the Shinsi-dong of the wife population at G-si. According to the evidence No. 73.44, a speed of about 70 km at a speed of 70 km from the port side of the port side in G oil station at G oil station at the instant accident site, according to the measurement conducted through a video reproduction program that stores about 10 m in the first place, the actual distance of the left and right from the CCTV installed at the G oil station at approximately 182m prior to the instant accident site is about 51m, and as such, the Defendant vehicle driven the said distance at approximately 2.5 seconds (25m frame) at the beginning of the first place, making it possible to see that the Defendant vehicle continues to proceed with the speed of about 2.4m. 4m.

km was proceeding at the speed of km.

B. At that time, the network E (hereinafter “the network”) driven the F bargaining car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) under the condition of 0.253 percent of alcohol concentration in blood, and according to the evidence Nos. 7, the speed of the above road from the frontline of the Defendant’s vehicle at approximately 45.9km at the speed of the Defendant’s vehicle. If it is assumed that the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven along the distance on the CCTV on the above G gas station at approximately 4 seconds (40 centimeters as a result of the measurement through the above video reproduction program), the speed of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time was about 45.9km/h (the speed of the first 12.75m).

While driving a two-lane at a speed, due to the negligence that caused a sudden change of course to a one-lane, and neglected to perform the duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brakes, the starting part of the center of the above road, which is located on the left side of the running direction of the defendant vehicle, was shocked into the front part of the left side of the plaintiff vehicle and stopped between the first lane and the second lane of the above road.

C. The National Investigative Research Institute No. 7, approximately approximately 25.53 meters of the Plaintiff’s vehicle around the shocking of the central separation line of the vehicle.