1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)

(a) Attached Form 1,882,172 square meters of forest E in Jeonnam-gun, Namnam-gun;

2. Drawings.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 23, 1984, Plaintiff B, a mining business entity, concluded a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase the amount of KRW 900,000,000, out of the forest land in the Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, Seoul, which was owned by the Defendant, for the development of the mine, and the Plaintiff B agreed to jointly use the existing road from this Ri to the mine, and the expansion and repair of the existing road shall be responsible by Plaintiff B.

(hereinafter “Initial Sales Contract”). (b)

The Plaintiffs were the forests purchased by Plaintiff B from February 1984, and have been engaged in mine business in part of the entire area of 30,083 square meters of forest land G in Namnam-gun, Namnam-gun, which was divided from the forests and fields that were divided before the division (hereinafter “H”) and the F forest land 1,882,172 square meters surrounding the said area (hereinafter “I”), under the name of Plaintiff B, J.

C. On July 24, 1995, the forest land before the division was divided into I and H, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of the plaintiffs' trade on July 20, 1995.

Meanwhile, while engaging in the mining business as above, the Plaintiffs used the access road portion of I of the instant case as a passage to enter H where the Plaintiffs are running the mining business. Moreover, on April 23, 2013, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking implementation of the registration procedure for transfer of ownership due to the completion of the prescription period for possession, as the main reason for the sale contract on February 23, 1984, on the lease portion of the instant case against the Defendant.

(This Court 2013Gadan20240). This Court shall set forth the separate sheet on March 10, 2014 in which the case is pending.

1. The decision to recommend reconciliation with the same contents as the written decision was made, and the decision to recommend reconciliation was finalized on March 27, 2014.

The evidence No. 4 and hereinafter referred to as “the reconciliation of this case”).

The "attached Form appraisal sheet" stated in the decision shall be as specified in the attached Form of this case.

2. The same shall apply to drawings;

E. On February 17, 2015, Plaintiff A was against H.